Is Dim Mak for real?
None of my Tai Chi teachers ever talked of dim mak. Does this mean its not real?
I once got the opportunity to meet George Dillman, that Karate chap who was at the forefront of the movement to popularize dim mak, but he didn’t turn up. As it turned out he was not even registered for stay at the hotel where we were supposed to meet.
Years later I found out that before our meeting Dillman had demonstrated to the Shaolin guys and they showed him up. Bummer.
The next time I saw dim mak for real was when Master Cheong Fook taught me the dim mak forms. He explained that it was more of a delayed death touch in that you strike at a certain point, cause a blood clot and tomorrow the opponent dies.
Except there is a little bit of a logic issue here. In the meantime, if the opponent is still moving does it not mean that he still has the opportunity to continue hitting you?
So unless you can hit the person so hard or in such a manner that you can KO him on the spot then dim mak wouldn’t be of much use. But then if you want to KO a person wouldn’t the time spent learning dim mak be better spent on perfecting say Mike Tyson’s devastating hook punch?
I mean there are a lot of videos of Iron Mike knocking his opponents out so there are tons of proof that it works. But I have not seen any master actually do it against someone who was actively fighting back. And best of all, you don’t have to remember what the points are, their names, points to hit in sequence, and time to hit what points.
Master Cheong was famous for his fighting ability. However, it wasn’t for his ability to use dim mak even though he was giving me a demonstration of how it would work. No, he didn’t knocked me out. He just showed that there is an actual logic to it by demonstrating that if a certain point was touched it would affect another part of the body, kinda like if you depress a water hose on one end the flow on the other end would be slower.
If dim mak is that effective why have we not seen masters of dim mak get into a ring to show that it can work on a resisting opponent? Or maybe its a case of it would only work on a believing, complying dummy.
Master Lo Man Kam, the nephew of Ip Man, once explained why dim mak would not work. He said that its one thing to hit a particular spot on a non moving arm and another to hit it on a moving arm.
In the meantime, I would give a benefit of a doubt, a wee bit to those who say it can work, but I am not holding my breath waiting for a convincing demo against a resisting opponent.
P.S. – I wrote this after reading the account of someone who recently attended a dim mak seminar by a famous master. The cronies tried to work the dim mak magic on the attendee but it didn’t affect him. Maybe they need to brainwash him first………